Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research



A comparative study of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block

Prerana P Mankad, Jayendra C Makwana, Bharat J Shah.




Abstract

Background: To compare the clinical profiles of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at equipotent doses for supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries, we hypothesized that both will induce a similar upper limb anesthetic blockade in terms of sensory and motor blockades.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of levobupivacaine and compare it with ropivacaine in brachial plexus block through supraclavicular route.

Materials and Methods: For this prospective study, 60 patients of both sexes ASA I/II were enrolled and divided into two groups, and supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed using levobupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.5% using classical approach. The onset of sensory and motor block, their duration, and possible adverse events were recorded.

Result: No statistically significant difference was observed in the onset of sensory block in both the groups. Onset of motor blockade was significantly faster with ropivacaine (9.50 ± 2.403 min) as compared to levobupivacaine (12.33 ± 2.537 min; P < 0.05). Duration of sensory and motor block was significantly short for ropivacaine than levobupivacaine (P < 0.05). Levobupivacaine has significantly longer duration of analgesia (12.56 ± 1.30 h) as compared to ropivacaine (9.93 ± 1.7 h; P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Levobupivacaine, a novel long-acting local anesthetic agent, having better profile in terms of duration of analgesia, with a considered disadvantage of delayed wearing off of motor blockade, offers an alternative to ropivacaine for brachial plexus block in upper limb surgeries.

Key words: brachial plexus block, levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, upper limb






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.