Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

Egypt. J. Exp. Biol. (Zoo.). 2009; 5(0): 51-56


GENETIC AND PHYSIOLOGIC VARIABILITIES AMONG THE EGYPTIAN POPULATIONS OF STENODACTYLUS STHENODACTYLUS (GEKKONIDAE: REPTILIA)

Mohamed W. Khalil.




Abstract

Fifteen samples of the ground-dwelling gecko Stenodactylus sthendodactylus inhabiting three Egyptian sandy desert localities at Fayoum, Giza and Sinai Peninsula were collected in this study. Polyacrylamide and agarose gel elctrophoresis were applied to examine phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (PGD), malate dehydrogenase (MDH), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and acid phospatase (ACP) in the liver tissues of these samples. Thirteen presumptive gene loci and twenty seven alleles were identified. Fayoum samples showed the highest genetic variability amongst the three studied populations. Out of thirteen recorded genetic loci, nine were polymorphic in Fayoum population while Giza and Sinai populations showed only three polymorphic loci. 31 % of Fayoum populations were shown to be heterozygotes compared to 7 % of Giza and 9 % of Sinai populations. The activities of both total enzymes and their fractions were shown to be generally higher in Giza samples than those of Fayoum and Sinai populations. Insignificant differences of both enzyme and fraction concentrations were revealed between Fayoum and Sinai samples except for PGD-3*, ACP-1* and ACP-2* which were significantly higher in Sinai populations.

Key words: Geckos, populations, isoenzymes electrophoresis, genetic variability






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.