Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

RMJ. 2014; 39(4): 381-385


Smoking related airflow limitation in asymptomatic healthy adults

Abdul Rehman Arshad, Ghulam Abbas Khan Niazi, Ammad Akram Chaudhary.




Abstract

Objective: To compare peak expiratory flow rates amongst smokers and nonsmokers.
Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out at 1 Mountain Medical Battalion and PAF Hospital Rafiqui from January to March 2014. Healthy male adults accompanying patients were selected by non-probability convenience sampling after verbal consent. Exclusion criteria included females, asthmatics, respiratory tract infections or patients unable to comprehend the technique of using peak flow meter. Hand held Mini-Wright peak flow meter was used to measure peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) in a standing position. Best of three attempts was recorded. Height, weight and chest circumference were measured. History of smoking was obtained and quantified in terms of pack years.
Results: 376 individuals were stratified into three groups: group 1 (18-26 years) having 116 individuals including 29 (25.00%) smokers; group 2 (27-34 years), having 147 individuals including 56 (38.10%) smokers; and, group 3 (35 years or older) with 113 individuals including 44 (38.94%) smokers. Smokers in group 1 had a 4.19% lower PEFR than nonsmokers (P=0.077). Smokers in group 2 and 3 had PEFRs 7.83% and 15.50% lower than those of nonsmokers respectively (P

Key words: smoking, peak expiratory flow rate, peak flow meter, respiratory function tests






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.