Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Mini Review



Open Versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion: A Brief Review

Tyler Thompson,Vitaley Kovalev.




Abstract
Cited by 0 Articles

Lumbar fusion is currently the most common surgery for patients suffering from chronic low back pain due to degenerative disk disease of the lumbar spine, among other indications. Since lumbar fusion was first performed in 1911 the technique was incrementally refined. Multiple approaches to access the spine were developed throughout the years which were guided by new technology and the desire to inflict minimum tissue disturbance during the surgery. The more recently developed minimally invasive approaches, although more technically difficult, involve smaller incisions, shorter operative time, less blood loss, and quicker post-operative recovery. Long term follow-up functional scores, however, are comparable between the open and minimally invasive approaches. Cost analyses suggest that the minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective, possibly due to lower resource utilization and shorter hospital stays.

Key words: lumbar surgery, lumbar fusion, minimally invasive surgery






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.