Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research



Harmonic scalpel assisted hemorrhoidectomy versus conventional Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in patients with Grade III and IV hemorrhoids: A prospective, randomized, controlled study

Vaibhav Rathi,Jogesh Chandra Marhual,Sibajyoti Satapathy.




Abstract
Cited by 0 Articles

Introduction: Harmonic scalpel Hemorrhoidectomy (HSH) is reported to have superior outcomes than Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH). However, there is considerable variability in time to return to daily activities, post-operative pain, operating time, and hospital stay. Aims and Objectives: To compare MMH and HSH in terms of various outcomes. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study was performed over a period of 12-months (December 2019 to November 2020) in the Department of General Surgery of a tertiary care hospital and included 60 adult patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids. The patients were randomly and equally divided into either of the two groups i.e., MMH (n=30) or HSH (n=30). Post-operatively patients were evaluated and follow-up to compare the outcomes, including operative time, intra-operative bleeding, post-operative pain, duration of hospitalization, time required to return to daily activities, and intra- and post-operative complications. Results: The time required to return to daily activity was significantly less in the HSH group (p-value=0.0004). The operative time, intra-operative bleeding, and duration of hospitalization were significantly less in the HSH group (all p-values

Key words: Harmonic Scalpel Hemorrhoidectomy, Hemorrhoids, Hemorrhoidectomy, Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.