Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

RMJ. 2020; 45(3): 510-512


A comparative study between TSOPT TB and tuberculin skin test for the diagnosis of tuberculosis

Ishtiaq Ishtiaq, Muhmmad Javaid Asad, Jamila, Muhammad Umer Khan, Tahira Tehseen, Rizwan Ahmed Kiani.




Abstract

Objective: To compare tuberculin skin test (TST) with T-Spot for diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB) as well as latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).
Methodology: This study was conducted at Department of Immunology, Islamabad diagnostic Center, Islamabad from January to December 2018. Blood Samples of 126 individuals for T SPOT and same patients were inoculated with PPD (Mantoux test).
Results: Among 126 participants, 64 (50.8%) were male and 62 (49.2%) were female. T-Spot. was positive in 52 (41.0%) while PPD was positive in 13 (10%). Furthermore, 25 (19.84%) T-Spot. TB test was positive for male while tuberculin skin test was positive in 6 (4.7%) male. T-Spot. was positive in 27 (21.4%) female while PPD was positive in 7 (5.5%). Additionally, one (0.79%) patient each of males and females was also found to be intermediate positive for PPD, which was clearly positive for T-Spot. TB test.
Conclusion: T-Spot. was much more sensitive and specific in all age groups and different clinical conditions including immune-compromised individuals. Skin test has limitation especially for older age groups but in T-Spot. is unaffected by age and provides excellent agreement.

Key words: Tuberclosis, IGRA, T Spot,tuberclin skin test






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.