Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

RMJ. 2021; 46(3): 500-502


Comparison of montelukast and ketotifen sodium in management of childhood asthma

Sadaf Nawaz, Raja Imtiaz Ahmed, Kamran Arzoo, Irum Javed, Nasim Ilyas, Kashif Rahim.




Abstract

Objective: To compare montelukast and ketotifen sodium in management of childhood asthma in Muzzafrabad, Pakistan.
Methodology: This randomized controlled trial of 6months duration from 15th May to 30th November 2017 was carried out at Pediatrics department of combined military hospital Muzaffarabad. It included 60 cases and were randomly divided into 2 groups; Group A was given Ketotifen 1mg once a day orally and Group B was given Montelukast sodium 5mg once a day orally at nighttime. Outcome was determined at 3rd month after treatment in terms of recurrence of severity of asthma using asthma severity score.
Results: Mean age was 8.58±3.27 years in all cases, while mean age in group-A and group-B was 8.93±3.18 years and 8.23±3.37 years. Overall, there were 36(60%) male and 24(40%) female cases while in group-A there were 22(73.3%) male and 8(26.7%) female cases and in group-B there were 14(46.7%) male and 16(53.3%) female cases. Mean severity in both groups before treatment was same (p=0.111). Mean Asthma severity score before treatment in group-A and group-B was 11.37±2.57 and 10.10±3.44, respectively. Mean Asthma score after treatment in group-A was higher (3.60±1.25) than group-B (2.10±0.92) (p

Key words: Montelukast, ketotifen, pediatric asthma.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.