Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

RMJ. 2020; 45(4): 834-837


Comparison between shockwave and ultrasound therapy in patients with plantar fasciitis

Riaz Hashmi, Muhammad Sajjad Yousaf, Naveed Arshad, Anam Naz, Maryam Shabbir, Saira Waqar.




Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of shockwave therapy with ultrasound and sham taping in patients with plantar fasciitis.
Methodology: This randomized control trial was done at Syed Medical Complex, Sialkot, Pakistan from 1st July to 31st July 2018. A total of 82 patients of planter fasciitis were divided into two groups, treatment and control group. Non probability consecutive sampling was used. Treatment group received shockwave therapy while the control group received ultrasound and sham taping. There were no drop outs thorough out study. The pain intensity was measured with visual analog scale (VAS) and patient specific functional scale (PSFS). Independent sample t test was used between group for comparison and p≤ 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Mean pain score before treatment of shockwave therapy group was 5.34±0.56 on VAS and 5.44±0.67 in ultrasound group. At end of last session, pain in shockwave therapy group was 1.54±0.67 while at ultrasound group was 2.46±0.64 (p=0.001). Functional scale mean before treatment of shockwave therapy group was 19.24±3.42 while in US and taping was and 16.29±3.84. After the last treatment session PSFS mean was 11.54±3.66 in ultrasound group while in shockwave therapy group was 4.98±2.18 (p=0.01).
Conclusion: Pain decreased and functional activity improved remarkably of patients who received shockwave therapy as compared to those who received ultrasound and sham taping.

Key words: Plantar fasciitis, shockwave, ultrasound.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.