Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

RMJ. 2021; 46(4): 869-872


Uterine rupture: A comparative evaluation of unscarred and scarred uterus

Najia Bhatti, Nusrat Aijaz, Tanweer Akhter, Shaista Tabassum Abro, Afshan Bhatti, Sana Tariq.




Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare outcomes and treatment options of uterine rupture in unscarred and scarred uterus.
Methodology: This prospective study of 100 cases (50 unscarred uterus and 50 scarred) for rupture was carried out from January 2016 to March 2019 at Sheikh Zaid Women Hospital, Larkana, Pakistan. Demographic details, multiparity and details of mismanaged labor, outcomes and surgical management were recorded.
Results: During the study period, 15,299 admissions were recorded and 100 cases of uterine rupture were collected, 50 without scarring to the uterine walls and 50 with the previous history of cesarean section. The death rate was high in unscarred uterus and more were undelivered. Hysterectomy was done in 10%, with 16% ICU care and 10% associated cervical and broad ligament trauma.
Conclusion: Poor antenatal care, illiteracy, obstructed labor, late arrival, poor contraception are main reason for unscarred uterine rupture while in scarred planned/unplanned VBAC and multiparty with less gap between two births are considered as main risk factor. It is important to increase awareness regarding contraception, mismanaged labor, early referral, and repeat elective section to decrease feto maternal morbidity.

Key words: Uterine rupture, scarred uterus, unscarred uterus, multiparity.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.