Home|Journals|Articles by Year Follow on Twitter

Directory for Medical Articles

Open Access

Original Research

Is problem-based learning a better teaching-learning tool for emergency obstetric care for undergraduate medical students?

Nalini Arora, Tripti Waghmare, Narayan Jana.

Background: Clinical emergency management requires critical thinking, interpersonal skills in addition to content knowledge of the clinical issue. Problem-based learning (PBL) as a teaching-learning method for clinical emergency case scenarios has not been analyzed separately in the medical literature.

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to compare learning outcomes and perception of medical graduates for lecture-based learning (LBL) and PBL for emergency obstetric care.

Materials and Methods: In a randomized controlled study, 34 medical students participated in a LBL group (n = 16) or PBL group (n = 18). Lecture class of 1 h or PBL method was used for teaching “eclampsia.” Pre-test and post-test questionnaires were administered to both groups. Perception about PBL method was collected by closed-ended (Likert scale) and open-ended questionnaire.

Results: Mean pre-test score of the PBL group was significantly lower than that of the LBL group (5.5, SD 2.2 vs. 7.2, SD 2.7; P = 0.048). Mean post-test score in the PBL group was higher than that of the LBL group (13.1, SD 1.6 vs. 12.1, SD 1.1; P = 0.064). Difference in mean of pre-test and post-test score was more in the PBL group (7.6 vs. 4.9). Students perceived PBL as a better method for teaching obstetric emergencies as it promotes collaboration with fellow students (17, 94.5%) and critical thinking (15, 83.3%). Majority (16, 88.8%) of students preferred a hybrid curriculum.

Conclusion: While knowledge gain in PBL is at least at par with LBL, PBL is perceived as a better and more effective method for learning obstetric emergencies.

Key words: Education; Medical; Problem-based Learning; Curriculum; Eclampsia

Similar Articles

A Transfer Learning-Based Approach with Deep CNN for COVID-19- and Pneumonia-Affected Chest X-ray Image Classification.
Chakraborty S, Paul S, Hasan KMA
SN computer science. 2022; 3(1): 17

Does the Covid-19 pandemic affect faith-based investments? Evidence from global sectoral indices.
Dharani M, Hassan MK, Rabbani MR, Huq T
Research in international business and finance. 2022; 59(): 101537

Event-Driven Acquisition and Machine-Learning-Based Efficient Prediction of the Li-Ion Battery Capacity.
Mian Qaisar S, AbdelGawad AEE, Srinivasan K
SN computer science. 2022; 3(1): 15

Superhydrophobic modification of nanocellulose based on an octadecylamine/dopamine system.
Wang L, Hui L, Su W
Carbohydrate polymers. 2022; 275(): 118710

An Encoder-Decoder-Based Method for Segmentation of COVID-19 Lung Infection in CT Images.
Elharrouss O, Subramanian N, Al-Maadeed S
SN computer science. 2022; 3(1): 13

Full-text options

Latest Statistics about COVID-19
• pubstat.org

Add your Article(s) to Indexes
• citeindex.org

Covid-19 Trends and Statistics
Follow ScopeMed on Twitter
Author Tools
eJPort Journal Hosting
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
ScopeMed is a Database Service for Scientific Publications. Copyright © ScopeMed® Information Services.

ScopeMed Web Sites