Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Research Article

EEO. 2021; 20(5): 2907-2915


THE PRINCIPLE PROPORTIONS OF PUBLIC OPINION ON MODERATE ROBOTICS

WATHQ ASMAEL HAMED, AKBA ZOHEER MOHAMMED.




Abstract

This paper examines the public perception of smart robots using an extraordinary concentration on ethical perspective. In doing so, the study reviews the supplementary literature and evaluates information from the comment sections of four public internet news posts on intelligent robots. The findings from the physical analysis of the explored comments indicate that public opinion regarding smart robots is very negative and that the debate is based on various accountability issues as well as the harmful social and economic consequences of robots around the earth. In particular, many comments are called "apocalyptic", indicating that the growth of smart robots is a threat to human existence, as well as changing the human labor through smart robots widens the socio-economic gap. Furthermore, the public debate over whether robots have "rights" or the environmental implications of the growth of robotics is central to this debate. In this paper, we can see a complete comprehensive classification of robots. And the crucial, ethical legal and social issues of robots can be seen. This research is based on Europeans on the robotics roadmap, plus it is the end result of 3 years of study and discussion with robotics and humanities scholars. This classification refers to obvious or pressing or sensitive ethical difficulties in key application areas of robotics, making in-depth analysis further study.

Key words: principle proportions, Applied Ethic, Information Ethic, Human Enhancement, Content analysis, public opinion, Roboethics, Smart robot, dendrogram approach.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.