Abstract

AIM: The aim of the study is to compared two point-of care hemoglobin concentration measuring devices with laboratory measurements to determine their accuracy in mobile blood collection conditions. This two devices were the Pronto-7 (Masimo Corp., Irvine,CA) pulse co-oximeter and HemoCue Hb 201+ uses spectrophotometric method.
METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 152 individuals. The samples were tested for total hemoglobin measurement by three different methods: noninvaziv pulse co-oximeter device Pronto-7, finger-stick blood sample on an automated spectrophotometric device HemoCue and venous samples on an automated hemotology analyzer (reference device)
RESULTS: According to the venous samples (mean Hb value is 14.6 g/dl), the mean hemoglobin levels were detected slightly higher in the fingerstick samples (mean Hb value is 15.1 g/dl) and slightly lower in the pulse co-oximetry (mean Hb value is 14.1 g/dl). The sensivity of HemoCue, Pronto-7 was 97.7%, 81.6% and their specifity was 31.2% and %43.7, respectively. The positive predictive values (PPV) of HemoCue and Pronto-7 were high (92.3% and 92.5%, respectively) but both of their negative predictive values (NPV) were low (62.5% and 21.8%, respectively). Of blood donors, 88.4% (138/152) percent were correctly classified with HemoCue and 78.2% were with Pronto-7.
COCLUSION: Taking automated laboratory hemoglobin measurement as a reference, Pronto-7 gave lower readings for Hb value and was less accurate than the Hemo-Cue system

Key words: Blood Donor, Hemoglobin

Article Language: Turkish English