Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Meta-Analysis

Ulutas Med J. 2022; 8(3): 110-117


Clinical Efficacy of Doripenem in Treating Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kun-Yu Wu, Chien-Ming Chao, Guang-Mao Lee.




Abstract
Cited by 0 Articles

This meta-analysis investigated whether the clinical efficacy of doripenem is comparable to that of alternative antibiotics for treating hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and EBSCO databases were searched for literature published before October 20, 2021. Clinical studies comparing the efficacy of doripenem with that of other antibiotics in HAP/VAP treatment were included. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality at 28 to 30 days, whereas the secondary outcome was the clinical cure rate. In total, 5 clinical studies were included in this meta-analysis. All-cause mortality did not differ significantly between doripenem and the comparators. For VAP alone, no statistical differences were observed between doripenem and the comparators. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa-related pneumonia, mortality did not differ between doripenem and the comparators. The clinical cure rates were 60.7% and 57.3% for doripenem and the comparators, respectively; a similar trend was observed in the subgroup analysis for VAP. For HAP/VAP due to P. aeruginosa, the clinical cure rates for doripenem and the comparators did not differ. Doripenem was comparable to other antibiotics in the treatment of HAP and VAP.

Key words: Doripenem, hospital-acquired pneumonia, mortality, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ventilator-associated pneumonia






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.