ADVERTISEMENT

Home| Journals| Articles by Year| Audio Abstracts
 

Review Article

IJMDC. 2026; 10(9): 2856-2866


Safety and efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction combined with prophylactic corneal cross-linking (SMILE-Xtra) for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Meaad Ahmed Alshamrani, Bushra Khalid Al Sannah, Abdalrhman Saud Alblwan, Areej Mutlaq Alosaimi, Mohannad Abdulkhaleq Alshehri, Omar Gharmallah Alghamdi, Rana Mansour Almutairi, Tala Abdulaziz Almeghiwli, Yousef Alotaibi, Yousef Amin Alsayed.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

Introduction: Myopia is a common refractive error worldwide, and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) has become an established surgical option because of its favorable visual outcomes and better preservation of corneal biomechanics. Prophylactic corneal collagen cross-linking combined with SMILE (SMILE-Xtra) has been introduced to enhance corneal stability in patients at increased risk of postoperative ectasia. However, the available evidence regarding its safety and efficacy remains inconclusive.
Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SMILE-Xtra compared with conventional SMILE in patients with myopia, focusing on refractive outcomes, corneal stability, and postoperative complications.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS) were systematically searched from inception to May 2026. Comparative studies evaluating SMILE-Xtra versus conventional SMILE in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism were included. Pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.
Results: Seven studies were included in the review. No significant differences were found between SMILE-Xtra and conventional SMILE regarding spherical equivalent refraction, central corneal thickness, or mean keratometry. However, SMILE-Xtra demonstrated a significantly lower postoperative refractive cylinder. Overall, the included studies reported favorable safety outcomes with no evidence of increased major complications following SMILE-Xtra.
Conclusion: SMILE-Xtra appears to be a safe and effective adjunct to conventional SMILE, particularly for patients at higher risk of postoperative corneal ectasia, while maintaining comparable refractive outcomes. Further prospective randomized studies with standardized protocols and longer follow-up are required to confirm its long-term safety and efficacy.

Key words: Keywords: Myopia; SMILE; SMILE-Xtra; Corneal collagen cross-linking; Systematic review; Meta-analysis.







Bibliomed Article Statistics

18
R
E
A
D
S

2
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
09
2026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.