Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts RSS - TOC
 

-

Equijost. 2015; 3(2): 99-104


COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE STUDY OF EFFICIENCIES FOR THREE DIFFERENT SOLAR WATER DISTILLERS

Umar, S.; Muhammad U. K.; Yakubu A.; Musa, M.; Abubakar, M..




Abstract

In this research paper an attempt was made to compare the performance of three different single slope basin solar still under the same climatic condition of Aliero town, 12o 16’72’N latitude and 4o27'6'E longitude. The experiment used three identical size solar stills having different design modifications named as distiller A (with blackened ceremic besin material), distiller B (with galvinized iron besin material non removable top) and distiller C (with galvinized iron top removable). The field efficiency was computed and used for comparison, the result obtained shows that distiller B has the highest efficiency of 40.05% followed by distiller A with 19.19% while C recorded the lowest efficiency of 7.7%. Distiller A’s low performance could be attributed to its low thermal conductivity while C 's poor performance was as a result of heat loss at the top side of the system. However, despite the fact that distiller A shows low field performance compered to B, ceremic could still be used as solar still besin materials, even though it was able to produce about 2 litres per day to overcome the corrosion- effect challenges.

Key words: efficient, solar still, ceremics, galvinized, iron, thermal, conductivity, Basin materials






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Review(er)s Central
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.