ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article



Clinical Course and Reaction Profile of Patients Undergoing Venom Immunotherapy

Fikriye Kalkan,Begüm Gorgulu Akin,Makbule Seda Bayrak Durmaz,Betül Özdel Öztürk,Sadan Soyyigit.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

Introduction: Bee venom allergy is a major cause of anaphylaxis in adults. Venom Immunotherapy (VIT) is the only proven curative treatment, but the frequency and management of local and systemic reactions during therapy remain essential for safety. This study aimed to evaluate the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing VIT and to analyze reaction rates and management strategies.
Methods:This retrospective single-center study included 31 patients (18 honeybee, 13 vespid) who received VIT at the Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Allergy and Clinical Immunology Clinic between October 2024 and September 2025. All patients received a standard premedication protocol. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were obtained from medical records. Systemic reactions were classified according to the Ring–Messmer grading system, and management strategies for VIT-related reactions were analyzed.
Results:The mean age of the patients was 41.5 ± 15.3 years, and 61.3% were male. A history of beekeeping was significantly more common among honeybee-allergic patients (p = 0.009). Index sting reactions were frequently severe, with Grade 3 reactions observed in 58.1% of cases. Respiratory (77.4%) and cardiovascular (64.5%) involvement were the most common manifestations, and adrenaline was administered in 54.8% of index reactions. During VIT, 12 patients (38.7%) developed reactions, of which 7 (22.6%) were systemic. Systemic reactions occurred more frequently in the honeybee VIT group than in the vespid group, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.101). Most systemic reactions were mild to moderate and occurred early during treatment. In selected cases, VIT was successfully continued with dose adjustment and adjunctive omalizumab therapy.
Conclusion:Systemic reactions during VIT were more frequent among honeybee venom–allergic patients but were generally mild to moderate and manageable. With close monitoring, appropriate dose modifications, and biologic support when indicated, VIT can be safely continued in most patients.

Key words: Venom immunotherapy, Bee venom allergy, honeybee allergy , vespid allergy , anaphylaxis, omalizumab







Bibliomed Article Statistics

7
R
E
A
D
S


D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
07
2026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.