Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts RSS - TOC
 

Original Research



The effect of antigen retrieval buffers on MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of peptide profiles in skin FFPE tissue

Pumza Magangane, Nonhlanhla Khumalo, Henry Adeola.




Abstract

Abstract
Objectives: The success of novel in-situ immunohistoproteomics approaches that employ Matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) heavily depends on good antigen retrieval efficacy.
Methods: We have optimized the effect of various antigen retrieval buffers on peptide profiles acquired from FFPE traction alopecia scalp tissue. Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) was performed using Citrate, Tris, and Tris-EDTA buffers under various conditions. MALDI-MSI analysis of the tissue was performed using a high-throughput, state-of-the-art RapiFlex MALDI TOF/TOF tissue-typer equipped with a smart beam laser.
Results: Background matrix peaks were found under most conditions except under Tris-EDTA buffer. Trypsin digestion periods longer than overnight and possibly higher concentrations are needed for Citrate and Tris. The Tris-EDTA buffer performed best for MALDI-MSI antigen retrieval at an incubation period of overnight at 60°C.
Conclusions: We have identified in this study that antigen retrieval conditions need to be optimised prior to MALDI MSI analysis of different tissue types.

Key words: Skin, MALDI MSI, antigen retrieval, buffer, mass spectrometry, FFPE






Full-text options


Share this Article



Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com
• ojshosting.net




eJManager.com
Review(er)s Central
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.