ADVERTISEMENT

Home| Journals| Articles by Year| Audio Abstracts
 

Research Article

Open Vet J. 2026; 16(9): 6624-6633


Preliminary phenotypic screening of Staphylococcus aureus occurrence and antimicrobial resistance in rabbit production sources in Can Tho City, Vietnam, 2023–2024

Nguyen Thu Tam, Huynh Ngoc Trang.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

Background:
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is an important opportunistic pathogen in rabbits, where staphylococcosis can affect animal health and antimicrobial-resistant strains may complicate disease control. Information on phenotypic S. aureus occurrence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in rabbit production systems in Vietnam remains limited.

Aim:
This short communication aimed to describe the occurrence of phenotypically identified presumptive S. aureus in rabbit vaginal swabs, cage-floor swabs, and soybean meal samples from a single commercial rabbit farm in Can Tho City, Vietnam, and characterize the antimicrobial susceptibility and multidrug resistance (MDR) profiles of the recovered isolates.

Methods:
A cross-sectional exploratory study was conducted on one purposively selected commercial rabbit farm from November 2023 to May 2024. A total of 180 samples were collected: one vaginal swab from each of 70 sexually mature female rabbits, 50 cage-floor swabs, and 60 soybean meal samples. S. aureus was isolated on mannitol salt agar (MSA) and Baird–Parker agar (BPA) and phenotypically identified by catalase, coagulase and β-hemolysis testing. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for resistance percentages. Source-based and Jaccard clustering analyses were treated as descriptive and exploratory because of the single-farm design and small number of isolates.

Results:
Phenotypically identified presumptive S. aureus was recovered from 12/180 samples (6.67%): 6/70 rabbit vaginal swabs (8.57%), 3/50 cage-floor swabs (6.00%), and 3/60 soybean meal samples (5.00%). Fisher’s exact test yielded p = 0.752, which was treated as exploratory rather than evidence of population-level equivalence among sources. Resistance was recorded for penicillin in 10/12 isolates (83.33%; 95% CI 51.59–97.91), kanamycin and cephalexin in 7/12 each (58.33%; 27.67–84.83), streptomycin in 6/12 (50.00%; 21.09–78.91), gentamicin and amoxicillin in 5/12 each (41.67%; 15.17–72.33), ceftizoxime and tobramycin in 4/12 each (33.33%; 9.92–65.11), cefotaxime in 3/12 (25.00%; 5.49–57.19), and piperacillin in 1/12 (8.33%; 0.21–38.48). MDR was identified in 10/12 isolates (83.33%).

Conclusion:
This single-farm study provides preliminary phenotypic evidence that putative S. aureus with multidrug-resistant profiles can be recovered from rabbit-associated, cage-floor, and feed-related samples. Because species identity was not molecularly confirmed, no reference quality-control strain was available for disc diffusion testing, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening was not performed, and only 12 isolates were recovered, the findings should not be generalized beyond the sampled farm. Larger multi-farm studies incorporating confirmation of molecular species, validated antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) quality control, mecA/mecC testing, and resistance-gene or genomic characterization are required.

Key words: Antimicrobial resistance; Can Tho City; Preliminary phenotypic screening; Rabbit; Staphylococcus aureus.







Bibliomed Article Statistics

21
R
E
A
D
S

3
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
10
2026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.