ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article

Ulutas Med J. 2019; 5(2): 166-169


Results of Single and Double Flap Anastomosis in External Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgery

Mehmet Cubuk,Hulya Bardak,Savas Cetinkaya,Oguz Guvenmez.



Abstract
Download PDF Cited by 1 ArticlesPost

Background: Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is one of the most common oculoplastic surgeries. In this study, we aimed to compare single and double flap anastomosis results in external dacryocystorhinostomy surgery.
Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and November 2017, 156 patients who underwent external DCR were evaluated retrospectively. All cases were performed under general anesthesia. In the first group, 86 patients (52 female, 34 male) had a double flap external DCR. In the second group, 70 patients (40 female, 30 male) had a single flap external DCR.
Results: The mean follow-up period was 18.2±8.6 months in the double flap group and 16.4±5.4 months in the single flap group. The mean age was 48.2±16 in the double flap group and 46.3±17 in the single flap group. The success rate was 96.6% in the double flap group and 95.8% in the single flap group.
Conclusion: In our study, there was no difference in surgical success in patients undergoing single and double flap external DCR surgery.

Key words: External dacryocystorhinostomy, single flap, double flap







Bibliomed Article Statistics

30
35
44
59
37
24
17
32
16
27
24
24
R
E
A
D
S

30

15

16

77

20

22

13

13

10

12

12

16
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
030405060708091011120102
20252026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.