Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article



Does high surgical risk affect the management and outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis? A single-center retrospective analysis

Ali Kemal Kayapinar, Ahmet Ergin Capar.




Abstract

We compared the management and results of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in high surgical risk (HSR) and normal surgical risk (NSR) acute cholecystitis (AC) patients. The patients were divided into two groups: 60 patients with NSR and 30 patients with HSR. Pre-PC laboratory values, PC efficiency in terms of AC complications, catheter withdrawal method and duration, catheter-related complications, AC recurrence rate, mortality rate, presence of dyspeptic complaints in definitive PC, and cholecystectomy rate were compared. Technical and clinical success were achieved in 90 (100%) patients and, 85 (94.4%) patients with PC, respectively. The mortality developed in the HSR group; however, it was not seen in the NSR group (p=0.003). Five (83.3%) out of 6 (6.7%) patients with the American Society of Anesthesiology classification system (ASA) IV score developed mortality. With PC, clinical success was achieved in all 8 (100%) patients with suspected perforated cholecystitis and 6 (75%) of 8 patients with suspected emphysematous cholecystitis on abdominal CT in the non-acute abdomen. PC complications were seen in 8 (8.8%) and recurrent cholecystitis in 8 (12.5%) patients. The hospital stay was longer, and the rate of definitive treatment with PC was higher in the HSR group (p=0.019, p=0.008). C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels were higher in the NSR group (p

Key words: Percutaneous cholecystostomy, acute cholecystitis, high surgical risk, cholelithiasis, perforated cholecystitis, emphysematous cholecystitis






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.