ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article



Comparison of high flow nasal oxygen and standard nasal oxygen in preventing hypoxia in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography under sedation

Bilge Tuncer, Sumeyye Demirhan, Ozer Tuc, Ezgi Erkilic.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can be particularly challenging for anesthesiologists because of the increased difficulty in airway access when it is performed in the prone position, alongside typically older patients with increased comorbidities. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) versus standard nasal oxygen (NO) in preventing hypoxemia in patients undergoing deep sedation monitored by Bispectral Index (BIS) during ERCP procedures. This prospective clinical study included 187 patients. Patients were allocated to the NO or HFNO group. Frailty levels were evaluated using the Modified Frailty Index-11 (mFI-11) before the procedure. Sedation was adjusted to maintain BIS values between 60 and 80. The SpO2 levels at 5 and 10 min were higher in the HFNO group than in the NO group (p=0.002 and p=0.003, respectively). The changes in SpO2 over time differed significantly between the groups (F=7.315, p

Key words: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, high-flow nasal oxygen, nasal oxygen, deep sedation, prone position







Bibliomed Article Statistics

2
R
E
A
D
S

16
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
06
2026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.