ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article



Preference and use of different suture materials among surgeons: An original study

Omer Faruk Geckil, Nida Geckil.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

The choice of suture critically impacts surgical results, considering both clinical and logistical aspects. Despite the range of suture materials available, studies on surgeon preferences and related complications are insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the preferences of surgeons regarding suture materials and identify the correlation between material choice and postoperative complications. A cross-sectional survey was performed with 200 surgeons representing various surgical specialties. Demographic data, suture preferences (skin and deep tissue), selection criteria (tissue type, biocompatibility, supply/cost), and complication experience (inflammation, wound dehiscence) were all collected via structured questionnaires. Surgeons most often chose rapid vicryl for skin closure (55.0%, n=110), and vicryl for deep tissue (77.5%, n=155). A majority (n=147, 73.5%) prioritized the supply chain and price in their selection. The choice of 18.5% (n=37) of the surgeons was influenced by monofilament or multifilament properties. There was a strong link between selection criteria and the choice of suture for both skin and deep tissue (p

Key words: Polydioxanone, suture materials, surgeon preferences, vicryl







Bibliomed Article Statistics

37
42
27
57
R
E
A
D
S

40

22

35


D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
03040506
2026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.