ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

Med Arch. 2012; 66(5): 324-328


Which Is a Better Indicator of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Patients with Benign Prostatic Enlargement – Intravesical Protrusion of Prostate or Bladder Wall Thickness?

Damir Aganovic, Munira Hasanbegovic, Alden Prcic, Benjamin Kulovac, Osman Hadziosmanovic.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

Objective: to determine the correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) and bladder wall thickness (BWT) with clinical and urodynamic parameters, as well as their sensitivity and specificity with regard to bladder outlet obstruction in patients with a benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Materials and methods: 111 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and confirmed BPE completed the International Prostatic Symptom Score (I-PSS), as well as a transabdominal ultrasound to determine their prostate volume, a grade of IPP and BWT. All the patients were then subjected to the complete urodynamic studies (UDS). Results: the IPP showed a good correlation with the prostate volume (r=0.61) and serum PSA (r=0.48); p=0.0000, free uroflowmetry (r=-0.27; p=0.004), as well as the determinants of urodynamic obstruction: bladder outlet obstruction index–BOOI (r=0.36; p

Key words: benign prostatic enlargement, intravesical prostatic protrusion, bladder wall thickness, UDS.







Bibliomed Article Statistics

24
39
47
49
43
35
55
62
47
44
55
26
R
E
A
D
S

18

16

18

9

9

8

7

13

10

19

12

3
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
030405060708091011120102
20252026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.