Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research



Polydipsia: Comparative action of two antipsychotics – Pimozide and ziprasidone

Rakesh Ranjan Pathak, Seema Rawat, Shambhu Sharan Prasad.




Abstract

Background: Primary polydipsia occurs without any central (vasopressin) deficit and/or peripheral (nephrogenic) organic impairment-associated with schizophrenia/obsessive compulsive disorder. In absence of associated symptoms/signs, it is idiopathic (might be preclinical/prodromic). Antipsychotics are tried with some claim but none is satisfactory.

Aims and Objective: Unlike ziprasidone, pimozide misses D1/muscarinic/adrenergic/histaminic actions - the experiment assessed its physiological manifestation and clinical potentials against polydipsia.

Materials and Methods: Three batches of 21 Wistar male albino rats into two successive phases (viz. Normal and, after a washout period for 30 days, schedule-induced polydipsia) were divided into 3 groups (minimal, half maximal, and maximal dose). These 3 groups were divided into 3 subgroups of control, drug 1 and drug 2-each of 7 rats. Rat doses were “analogous” to permitted human doses.

Result: Daily water intake lowering effect was evident only in polydipsic rats. Half-maximal dose of ziprasidone equated to maximal dose of pimozide.

Conclusion: Ziprasidone (half maximal dose) can avoid the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of pimozide (maximal dose) in humans polydipsia - though ADR manifestations may be wide-spread (more receptors involved).

Key words: Polydipsia; Schizophrenia; Pimozide; Risperidone; Body Weight






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.