Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article

AJVS. 2022; 74(1): 24-30


Comparative Study Between the Sequencing of 16sRNA gene and Traditional Identification Methods of Some Bacterial Pathogens Associated with A Systemic Bacterial Infections from Diseased Poultry Flocks

Mona A. AbdelRahman, Karim Selim, Amany Adel.




Abstract

Poultry health problems of chickens are usually accompanied by bacterial systemic infections causing severe losses in flocks, sick birds were systemically could be infected by several bacteria regardless of the clinical signs. 16s RNA sequence is a modern approach for the diagnosis of bacterial infection, especially of multiple causative agents. Ten field cases suffering from systemic infections have been examined for bacterial causes, using conventional isolation and 16S rRNA sequencing, The ten sequenced samples were compatible with the results of isolation; six samples were similar to E.coli species with identity% = 97-99%, while it had similarity% < 96% with Salmonella enterica. While the other samples showed variable identity ranging from 94-99% with Salmonella enterica, E. coli, Enterobacter spp and Klebsiella spp
In conclusion, although conventional isolation is the golden standard method for bacterial diagnosis, however, the 16s RNA sequencing has elaborated excellence in diagnosis and identification of bacterial infection, concerning the time consuming, detection of multi-caused infections and sensitivity.

Key words: Keywords: 16sRNA, sequencing, poultry.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.