ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Review Article



The Future of Scholarly Communication: Integrating ChatGPT into Research Writing Practices

Avinash Namdeo Jadhao, Anita S. Chalak.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models like ChatGPT, into healthcare and research processes has garnered significant interest. This review synthesizes findings from various studies examining the efficacy, benefits, and limitations of ChatGPT across multiple domains, including literature searches, data extraction, and academic writing. While ChatGPT demonstrates high sensitivity and efficiency in tasks such as abstract screening and data extraction from clinical notes, challenges remain regarding accuracy, ethical considerations, and the risk of misinformation. Many studies emphasize the necessity for human oversight to mitigate issues such as biases and hallucinations. Additionally, the potential for ChatGPT to enhance research workflows and improve scientific communication is underscored, though concerns regarding authorship and ethical usage persist. Overall, the findings highlight ChatGPT’s transformative potential in healthcare and research while advocating for cautious integration and further validation of its capabilities.

Key words: Chat GPT, Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare, Ethical Considerations, Academic Writing







Bibliomed Article Statistics

34
22
13
10
13
4
R
E
A
D
S

24

17

12

11

9

2
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
070809101112
2025

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.