Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research



Comparative study of continuous epidural 0.1% Ropivacaine versus 0.125% Bupivacaine on post-operative pain relief following total knee replacement

Jigna Shah, Ruchin Parikh.




Abstract

Background: Bupivacaine has similar pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties to Ropivacaine but has shown to have higher cardiac and CNS toxicity and greater separation between sensory and motor block.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of continuous infusion of epidural Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for post-operative analgesia, study the effect of two drugs in maintaining the hemodynamic stability and post-operative complications of both the drugs.

Materials and Methods: 60 patients were randomly allocated to receive epidural, continuous infusion of 0.1% Ropivacaine (Group A), or continuous infusion of 0.125% Bupivacaine (Group B).

Result: Ropivacaine group has less fluctuation in pulse, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation than Bupivacaine group and difference was statistically significant. Pain relief was batter among Bupivacaine group of patients as compared to Ropivacaine group. And difference was significant. Pain appears early in group of Ropivacaine group as compared to group of Bupivacaine.

Conclusion: 0.1% Ropivacaine produced excellent post-operative epidural analgesia, which was clinically indistinguishable from a 0.125% concentration of Bupivacaine with the advantage of hemodynamic stability, fewer incidences of complication or adverse effect and patientÂ’s satisfaction.

Key words: Ropivacaine, Bupivacaine, epidural analgesia, hemodynamic stability






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.