ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

RMJ. 2026; 51(2): 533-537


Evaluating neurology residents’ communication and interpersonal skills through multisource feedback in a tertiary care setting: A cross-sectional study

Maimoona Siddiqui, Rahila Ali, Muhammed Tariq, Sadaf Majid, Mansoor Iqbal, Mazhar Badhsah.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

Objective: To evaluate the reliability of Multisource feedback (MSF) in assessing communication and interpersonal skills among neurology residents.
Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted at two major neurology departments in Islamabad over eight months. Nineteen residents were assessed by ten evaluators each, including faculty, peers, nurses, unit receptionists, neurophysiology technologists, patients, and self-assessments. A total of 209 evaluations were analyzed using SPSS 20. Cronbach’s alpha measured internal consistency; ANOVA was used to compare mean scores among rater types. A p0.05). Peers gave the lowest scores in interpersonal behavior items.
Conclusion: MSF is a reliable and feasible tool for evaluating communication and interpersonal skills among neurology residents. Incorporating feedback from diverse stakeholders provides a holistic view. Future research should explore the longitudinal use of MSF and its impact on professional development.

Key words: Multisource feedback, communication skills, interpersonal competence, patient satisfaction, resident evaluation.





Bibliomed Article Statistics

5
R
E
A
D
S

5
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
05
2026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.