Home|Journals|Articles by Year Follow on Twitter

Directory for Medical Articles
 

Open Access

Original Research

IJHRS. 2012; 1(1): 16-24


Comparative Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique and Static Stretching for Treatment of Subacute Mechanical Neck Pain

Richa Mahajan, Chitra Kataria, Kshitija Bansal.

Cited by (1)

Abstract
Background: Neck pain is a common problem within our society. Upper trapezius and the levator scapulae are the most common postural muscles that tends to get shorten leading to restricted neck mobility. If these group of muscles are treated it may provide with best results. There is lack of evidence to allow conclusions to be drawn about the effectiveness of Muscle energy technique (MET) when compared with stretching exercises for relieving mechanical neck pain. It would be interesting to study if these two techniques yield comparable outcomes and if one technique is superior to the next which should be the alternate choice of therapy
.
Objective: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Muscle energy technique and static stretching on pain and active cervical range of motion (ROM) in subacute mechanical neck pain

Subjects and methods: 45 patients with subacute mechanical neck pain were randomly assigned to receive Muscle Energy Technique plus conventional physiotherapy (group 1, n = 15), static stretching plus conventional exercise program (group 2, n = 15) and conventional physiotherapy only (group 3, n = 15).

Intervention: Group 1 received 6 sessions of Muscle Energy Technique and 10 sessions of conventional physiotherapy. Group 2 received 6 sessions of static stretching and 10 sessions of conventional physiotherapy. Group 3 received 10 sessions of conventional physiotherapy. All groups were treated for 2 weeks.

Outcome measures: Pain intensity on 100mm VAS, active cervical lateral flexion range of motion, active cervical rotation range of motion.

Results: Paired t-test was used for within group analysis. ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis was employed for between group comparisons. No significant difference was found in any of the outcome measure between MET and static stretching groups (p > 0.05) while both were found to be significantly better than the conventional exercise group (p < 0.05) between the 3 groups. Statistically significant improvements were found in all the 3 groups for all the outcome measures (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: This study concluded that both the treatment techniques, muscle energy technique and static stretching were effective in alleviating the mechanical neck pain in terms of decreasing pain intensity and increasing active cervical range of motion as there was no significant difference between the two groups, however MET was superior than static stretching in decreasing pain intensity and increasing active cervical range of motion.

Key words: Mechanical neck pain, Muscle energy technique, Static stretching



Similar Articles

An Operator's Experience of the Loss-of-Resistance Technique in Epidural Injections: An Observational Study.
Arici T
The Eurasian journal of medicine. 2021; 53(1): 48-52

The optimal structural analysis of cobalt-chromium alloy (L-605) coronary stents.
Wang H, Wang X, Qian H, Lou D, Song M, Zhao X
Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. 2021; (): 1-12

Propolis and Organosilanes as Innovative Hybrid Modifiers in Wood-Based Polymer Composites.
Odalanowska M, Woźniak M, Ratajczak I, Zielińska D, Cofta G, Borysiak S
Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2021; 14(2):

Clinical outcomes of double stent strategy for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions using current generation drug eluting stent comparing to early generation drug eluting stent; The Milan and New Tokyo (MITO) registry.
Watanabe Y, Mitomo S, Naganuma T, Kawamoto H, Takagi K, Chieffo A, Carlino M, Montorfano M, Nakamura S, Colombo A
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angi. 2021; 97(2): E198-E208

Survey on the main pediatric nursing techniques.
Marcaccio C, Lucani E
La Clinica terapeutica. 2021; 172(2): 123-128

Medicine in motion: Opportunities, challenges and data analytics-based solutions for traditional medicine integration into western medical practice.
Jansen C, Baker JD, Kodaira E, Ang L, Bacani AJ, Aldan JT, Shimoda LMN, Salameh M, Small-Howard AL, Stokes AJ, Turner H, Adra CN
Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2021; 267(): 113477

Hypothalamic Actions of SIRT1 and SIRT6 on Energy Balance.
Quiñones M, Martínez-Grobas E, Fernø J, Pérez-Lois R, Seoane LM, Al Massadi O
International journal of molecular sciences. 2021; 22(3):

Fever range whole body hyperthermia for re-irradiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: Final results of a prospective study.
Zschaeck S, Weingärtner J, Ghadjar P, Wust P, Mehrhof F, Kalinauskaite G, Ehrhardt VH, Hartmann V, Tinhofer I, Heiland M, Coordes A, Kofla G, Budach V, Stromberger C, Beck M
Oral oncology. 2021; 116(): 105240


Full-text options






Advertisement
American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging

SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE NOW




ScopeMed.com
CiteIndex.org
CancerLine
FoodsLine
PhytoMedline
Follow ScopeMed on Twitter
Author Tools
eJPort Journal Hosting
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
ScopeMed is a Database Service for Scientific Publications. Copyright ScopeMed Information Services.