Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article



Effect of Pelvic Endometriosis, Endometriomas and Recurrent Endometriomas on IVF-ET/ICSI Outcomes

Weijie Xing, Haiyan Lin, Zexuan Wu, Yu Li, Qingxue Zhang.




Abstract

Introduction: Endometriosis, the most common gynecological disorder, is a challenging disease observed in 20% - 40% of subfertile women. Material and Methods: 380 women were divided into four groups. Group A consisted of 176 women with pelvic endometriosis. Group B consisted of 125 women who had previously undergone a laparoscopic endometrioma cystectomy. Group C consisted of 38 women with recurrent endometriomas without aspiration before IVF-ET/ICSI. Group D consisted of 41 women with recurrent endometriomas undergone aspiration before IVF-ET/ICSI. Results: Baseline FSH level (8.61 ± 3.42 mIU/mL) and total dose of Gn (2337.15 ± 853.00 IU) in Group A were the lowest (p < 0.05). The number of retrieved oocytes in Group B (7.98 ± 5.05) was significantly fewer than those in Group A and D (p < 0.05). The numbers of MII oocytes in Groups A, C and D were significantly larger than that in Group B. The number of retrieved oocytes, high-quality embryos, implantation and pregnancy rates were similar in Groups C and D. Conclusions: Pelvic endometriosis had a less adverse effect on ovarian reserve than endometrioma. No advantage was found in transvaginal aspiration for recurrent endometriomas before IVF-ET/ICSI.

Key words: pelvic endometriosis, recurrent endometriomas, transvaginal aspiration, IVF-ET.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.