Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

RMJ. 2016; 41(3): 339-341


Immunoprophylaxis in Rh Incompatibility

Sadia Fahim, Muntiha Sarosh, Nikhat Ahsan.




Abstract

Objective: To investigate the frequency of Rh–ive patients and effectiveness of Rh immunization, comparing antibody titer before and after immunization.
Methodology: This comparative cross sectional study was carried out at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fatima Hospital, Baqai Medical University, Karachi, from January 2013 to June 2014. Fifty primigravid women with Rh –ve blood group and their husbands with Rh +ve blood group were included in the study. The antibody titer through indirect Coomb’s test was checked in all the patients at 28 weeks gestation. If –ve titers, AntiD 1500 IU for prophylaxis was given between 28-34 weeks. After delivery, if baby was Rh +ve, AntiD was given within 72 hrs. Antibody titer was again measured at 6 weeks postpartum.
Results: Out of 50 primigravidae, 68% were B –ve, 30% were A –ve and 2% were O –ve. At 28 wks, 78% showed 1:4 dilution, 22% showed 1:8 dilution and no one reached up to 1:16 dilution. Six weeks postnatally, when antibody titers were repeated, there was no significant increase in titer.
Conclusion: The antibody titers are independent of AntiD IgG and immunization did not affect the level of antibody titer. Anti D IgG is thus the only and most effective prophylaxis against the Rh incompatability disease.

Key words: Immunoprophylaxis, Anti D, Antibody titre, Rh incompatibility






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.