Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

Ann Med Res. 2010; 17(4): 355-358


Our Results of Follow-Up and Treatment in Anterior Herpetic Uveitis

 

Tamer Dem*, Rumeysa Tanyıldızı*

.




Abstract


 

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical findings, visual outcomes and treatment modalities of the patients with herpetic anterior uveitis.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed of 20 patients medical records who were followed by herpetic anterior uveitis in our clinic between 2005-2009. The diagnosis of herpetic uveitis was proven by the clinical findings.

Results: There were 9 (45%)  female and 11(55%) male patients with the mean  age of 40±16 years. Mean follow up time was 20±11 months. All of the patients had different levels of anterior chamber inflamation and 10 (50%) patients had  keratic presipitate. Twelve (60%) patients had corneal involvment; 7 of them had epitelyal keratitis and 5 of them had corneal scar. Nine (45%) patients had segmental  iris atropy, 6 30(%) patients had posterior synechia. Two (10%) patients had intraocular pressure elevation during this period. All patients treated with topical steroid and sistemic anti viral agents. Recurrence was devoloped in 10 (50%) patients during this period. The mean improvment of the visual acuity was 1,9 lines according to the snellen charts.

Conclusion: Diagnosis in anterior herpetic uveitis is dependant on clinical signs. Correct diagnosis and effective  treatment may decrease  complications and recurrences.

Key Words: Herpetic Uveitis; Treatment; Prognosis.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.