Home|Journals|Articles by Year Follow on Twitter| Subscribe to List

Directory for Medical Articles
 

Open Access

Original Research

Natl J Med Res. 2015; 5(3): 240-243


Prolene Hernia System (PHS) Versus Linchenstein Repair in Inguinal Hernioplasty: A Comparative Study

Rushin B Thakor, Darshan Patel, Chirag Shah, Gulab R Patel.

Abstract
Background: Surgeons are more interested in the techniques available, in recurrence rates, and in short term complications of hernia surgery. The present study was conducted with an objective to compare inguinal hernioplasty with the prolene hernia system verses Linchenstein repair.
Methodology: The present comparative study was conducted on the patient admitted with the diagnosis of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. These patients were randomly placed in two groups, one group was subjected to open tension free Prolene hernia system mesh hernioplasty & other group Linchenstein repair. The patients were assessed for the severity of post operative pain using visual analogue scale, duration of surgery, technical difficulty and post-operative complications like wound infection, wound seroma.
Results: Duration of surgery in case of Linchenstein mesh repair ranged from 40 -50 minutes and in PHS ranged from 60 - 80 minutes with mean of 70.4 minutes. For Linchenstein repair at the end of 7th day 24% cases have no pain, 60% cases have minimal pain, while 16% cases have moderate pain. For PHS at the end of 7th day 44% cases have no pain, 48% cases have minimal pain, while 8% cases have moderate pain. No patient has severe pain at the end of 7th and 15th day.
Conclusion: There is no significant difference found in hospital stay, Complications, chronic pain and recurrence rate in either group. PHS is bit difficult for new surgeon, it requires expertise.

Key words: Inguinal hernia, Linchenstein Repair, Prolene Hernia System, Hernioplasty


Full-text options

Full-text Article


Share this Article


Readers of this article also read the following articles
»THE FREQUENCY OF EPIDURAL CATHETER MIGRATION IN PATIENTS RECEIVING EPIDURAL ANALGESIA DURING LABOR INCREASES WITH TIME
»Carbamazepine provoked hepatotoxicity: attenuation by vitamin C
»SMURF and NEDD4 interference offers therapeutic potential in chaperoning genome integrity
»A comparative study to find out emotional quotient in students of MGM Medical College, Indore MP, India
»Frequency of Un-Safe Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media in Patients with Discharging Ear
»Effect of gender and body composition on dynamic lung function tests in young Gujarati Indian population
»Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of General Practitioners Towards Diabetes Mellitus in Hyderabad, Sindh
»Penile fracture: results of early repair and delayed repair
»Prevalence of Obesity among College Students in Rural Area of Bangalore
»Open Data Sharing in the Context of Bioresources
»Chronic Diseases, Self-Rated Health Status, Health Care Utilization and Health Insurance Status of Males in a Caribbean nation



Advertisement
Journal of Contemporary Medical Education

SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE NOW




ScopeMed.com
BiblioMed Home
Follow ScopeMed on Twitter
Author Tools
eJPort Journal Hosting
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
ScopeMed is a Database Service for Scientific Publications. Copyright ScopeMed Information Services.