There has been general consensus emanating from medical fraternity and general public alike to increase the formal teaching of ethics within the medical school curriculum. In particular, it challenges a prevailing belief within the culture of medicine that while it may be possible to teach skills in recognizing the presence of common ethical problems, skills in ethical reasoning, or improved understanding of the language and concepts of ethics, an entire curriculum can in no way predominantly influence a student's personality or ensure ethical conduct. Mountains of biomedical knowledge must be acquired to achieve the “modeling of” and “learning how to be” a caregiver and health professional. Role modeling remains a crucial area in the development of professionalism in medical students and doctors.
Medical institutions worldwide have recognized the importance of teaching medical ethics to their students. Since 1993, UK undergraduate medical education curricula have been required to include medical ethics1 and in 1999, the World Medical Association recommended that medical ethics be taught in all medical schools.2 Unfortunately the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC) does not require medical schools to teach bioethics as an independent subject.3 In Pakistan, some physicians still believe that medical students do not need a formal bioethics course during medical school. These physicians believe that students can learn ethical principles and behavior by “osmosis” namely, by working alongside their physician-teachers in clinics. The PMDC advises colleges offering MBBS and BDS courses as well as the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Pakistan to, at a minimum, incorporate medical ethics as part of the curriculum.4 Interestingly, PMDC suggests that ethics be taught within the forensic medicine course.5
Medical education, medical students, medical ethics.
Quantum Leap and Future Contribution of Annals of Laboratory Medicine.
Kim YJ, Hur M
Annals of laboratory medicine. 2022; 42(1): 1-2
On the syndemic nature of crises: A Freeman perspective.
Dosi G, Soete L
Research policy. 2022; 51(1): 104393
Student evaluation of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.
SzopiĹ„ski T, Bachnik K
Technological forecasting and social change. 2022; 174(): 121203
More collaboration, less seriousness: Investigating new strategies for promoting youth engagement in government-generated videos during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.
He C, Liu H, He L, Lu T, Li B
Computers in human behavior. 2022; 126(): 107019
Trainee Reliance on Public Service Loan Forgiveness.
Khoury MK, Jones RE, Gee KM, Taveras LR, Boniakowski AM, Coleman DM, Abdelfattah KR, Rectenwald JE, Minter RM
Journal of surgical education. 2021; ():