ADVERTISEMENT

Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article

J App Pharm Sci. 2015; 5(7): 041-047


Comparative botanical and phytochemical evaluation of Calotropis procera Linn. and Calotropis gigantea Linn. Root

Sharad Srivastava, Adarsh Pratap Singh, A. K. S. Rawat.



Abstract
Download PDF Post

The present study evaluates and develops pharmacognostical and phytochemical descriptors (HPTLC) of Calotropis procera and Calotropis gigantea for their quality control. β – sitosterol one of the major terpene content of this species, which is a potent antioxidant, purgative, antispasmodic and expectorant, has also been studied through a simple and high-precision method using high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC), which may be utilized by pharmacological drug industries for quality evaluation, ensuring successful commercial exploitation of this drug.
From the present study it has been observed that both Calotropis procera and C. gigantea have similar microscopic characteristics, physico-chemical parameters studied showed a little variation as total ash components and total extractive values are little less in C. gigantea. HPTLC studies also showed similar qualitative profile with some quantitative variations in total β-sitosterol, which was higher in C. gigantea (2.79%).

Key words: Pharmacognosy, HPTLC, Calotropis procera, Calotropis gigantea







Bibliomed Article Statistics

31
56
69
57
54
65
53
49
49
63
53
3
R
E
A
D
S

11

8

16

15

13

13

9

10

15

29

24

1
D
O
W
N
L
O
A
D
S
040506070809101112010203
20252026

Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Author Tools
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.