In today's age of global dissociation, it has become necessary to deal with the social and clinical aspects of dissociation, which is a "psychosocial denial experience" in terms of ideational, emotional, relational, behavioral and sensory aspects. In dysfunctional nations experiencing psychosocial denial, democracy unfortunately functions as the majority's freedom to make wrong decisions. The freedom of the majority to make wrong decisions creates “dissociative and misanthropic masses” and causes “universal violence circulation” and despotism to prevail. Dissoanalysis and “Ozturk’s Pervasive and Reversible Dissociative Fusion Theory” define the universal circulation of violence as a reversible “dissociative violence oscillation” associated with trauma, which spreads from individual to society and from society to individual. The submissive mode associated with the experience of connecting to their oppressors and dictators is contagious; it spreads from traumatized and dysfunctional individuals to dissociated and dysfunctional societies, creating fused interpersonal relationships and both conformist and sadomasochistic masses. The dissoanalytic school defines the phenomenon of dissociation, which is most closely related to chronic, complex and cumulative traumatic experiences, which can transform from the individual to the social dimension and from the social dimension to the individual dimension in the face of oppression, and even be experienced simultaneously in the individual and social dimensions, both in relational and psychosociopolitical contexts. Dissoanalytic psychohistory, which continues its development rapidly in parallel with the principles of dissoanalysis and modern psychotraumatology, has far outstripped the stable and dogmatic schools of psychiatry, psychology, and history with its integrative solution-oriented approaches and effective psychosocial prevention strategies towards the phenomenon of trauma-related dissociation and individual and mass obedience cycles against oppression. In this original article, Ozturk defined the phenomenon of “objectification trap”, “controlled human syndrome” and “shared dissociative identity disorder” as the triple pillar of fused bilateral relations dominated by reversible dominative and submissive modes from the perspective of dissoanalysis theory and dissoanalytic psychohistory.
Key words: Shared dissociative identity disorder, controlled human syndrome, objectification trap phenomenın, defector alter personality, dissoanalytic psychohistory, dissoanalysis
|
