Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research

RMJ. 2011; 36(4): 262-268


Comparison of maximal infusion rate of FMS 2000 fluid warmer on various catheters and fluids

Yong Han Kim, Young Gyun Choi, Sira Bang, Sang Eun Lee, Jae Hong Park, Sang Yoon Jeon, Jung Dae Shin, Ki Hoon Kim, Jin Soo Kim.




Abstract

Objective
To compare the maximal infusion rate of FMS 2000 fluid warmer on various intravenous catheters and fluids.
Methods
This study was performed on 4th February 2011 in operation room, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, Republic of Korea. 0.9% sodium chloride (NS), Ringer’s lactate (RL), and 6% hydroxylethyl starch 130/0.4 (HES) were applied to FMS 2000 fluid warmer. After FMS 2000 was equipped with one kind of fluid, 16 types of catheter including double lumen catheter were connected to the end of line. We accelerated infusion rate to 750ml/min under 300mmHg of pressure limit. Maximal infusion rate under 300mmHg was measured three times. Maximum value of maximal infusion rate was compared.
Results
7-, 8.5F rapid infusion catheter (RIC) resulted in rate of 750ml/min in NS, RL and HES group. Other catheters did not exceed 750ml/min. Maximal infusion rate of NS and RL was faster than HES in all kinds of catheter except RIC. There was no statistically significant difference between NS and RL.
Conclusion
Maximal infusion rate of HES is slower than NS and RL in ordinary sized venous catheter using FMS 2000. NS and RL had no difference in maximal infusion rate. (Rawal Med J 2011;36:262-266).

Key words: Fluid warmer, hydroxylethyl starch, intravenous infusion.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.