Home|Journals|Articles by Year

Directory for Medical Articles
 

Open Access

Original Article

IJBH. 2021; 9(2): 75-80


Vascular Risk Factors in Post-stroke Depression in Young Adults: a Prospective Cohort Study

Enra Mehmedika Suljic, Nevena Mahmutbegovic, Admir Mehicevic, Merjema Arnautovic, Dzemaluddin Mulalic, Amina Babic.

Abstract
Background: Previous research suggested a predictive role of vascular risk factors (VRFs) in developing post stroke depression (PSD), however this relationship in young stroke patients still remain unclear. Objective: The aim of our study was to examine the association of VRFs and post-stroke depression in young adults. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study including 70 patients (aged ≤50 years) with incident ischemic stroke. Data on vascular risk factors were collected and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) was used to assess the mental status. Patients were stratified in 2 groups (depressed and non-depressed) according to DSM-IV criteria. A follow up was done after one month and after 6 months. Results: A total of 40 patients had a significantly higher HAMD score (17.56 3.1) compared to 30 patients in non-depressed group (5.87 1.72) (p< 0.0001) in acute stroke occurence, one month after stroke (18.182.69) vs (5.43 1.55) (p< 0.0001) and six months after stroke (19.08 2.30) vs (4.831.21) (p

Key words: stroke, risk factors, depression.






Similar Articles

Full-text options


Latest Statistics about COVID-19
• pubstat.org


Add your Article(s) to Indexes
• citeindex.org






Journal Finder
Covid-19 Trends and Statistics
CiteIndex.org
CancerLine
FoodsLine
PhytoMedline
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.