Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article

Ulutas Med J. 2023; 9(3): 152-157


Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Treatments for Primary Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Kazim Dogan.




Abstract

Introduction: The study evaluates the outcomes of different surgical techniques, including Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT), Trans-Obturator Tape (TOT), Burch Colpopexy (BC), and Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Repair (APR), in treating primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care center, comprising 62 women diagnosed with primary SUI who underwent one of the aforementioned surgical procedures. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed, including age, BMI, menopausal status, reproductive history, incontinence types, anticholinergic use, and preoperative assessments.
Results: No differences were found in age (p=0.227), weight (p=0.943), height (p=0.333), and BMI (p=0.642) among the four treatment groups. The distribution of menopausal patients and reproductive history variables did not differ among the groups. Postoperative anticholinergic prescription rates (p=0.769) and duration of use (p=0.531) were not different across the groups. The majority of patients in the TVT, TOT, and BC groups had a grade 2 cystocele (p=0.065). The BC group had 100% grade 1 rectocele, which was not significant compared to other groups (p=0.126).
Conclusion: Our results showed no potential difference in comparable outcomes among TVT, TOT, BC, and APR for the surgical treatment of primary SUI.

Key words: Stress urinary incontinence, tension-free vaginal tape, trans-obturator tape, burch colpopexy, anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.