There is not a certain casual relations in eceonomics as it is in natural sciences. Furthermore, it is open to discuss quite different methods. Since the world and human relations are in a continuous change, the discussing methods also vary continuously. As the 39-year-period of Nobel Economy Prize is viewed, the studies which mathematical methods are heavily used seemed to be more appropriate for The Nobel Prize. "Does it affect ·the guiding line of scientific studies?". "Does it strengthen The Neo- classical Economics which is already dominant conception? ". Furthermore, "Do both situations compose a mutual process?" These are the questions that come to mind along with methodical discussions. In this study, we wanted to examine the opinions within the term of Nobel Prize, which vary according to the subjects and problems that economics has to determine and resolve. We want to throw a light on which way the economics tend to go as we consider the economists and their studies who won The Nobel Prize in
Key words: Nobel Economy Prize, Economies Path Article Language: EnglishTurkish
|
