Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article



Reliability and Validity of the Greek Version of the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL-V)

Evdokia Misouridou, Polyxeni Mangoulia, Vasiliki Pavlou, Katerina Kasidi, Evangelia Stefanou, Eleftheria Mavridoglou, Martha Kelesi, Evagelos Fradelos.




Abstract

Background: Compassion constitutes a central element of all health and social care professions. The Professional Quality of Life Questionnaire is the most widely used instrument to measure compassion fatigue worldwide. Objective: The aim of this study was to provide evidence for the reliability and the validity of ProQOL-V for Greece. Methods: A total of 261 nurses selected by convenience sampling and required to complete the ProQOL and Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS). The reliability and validity of the scale was evaluated by correlation analysis, t-test, and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The overall Cronbach’s a for Compassion Satisfaction was 0.87 ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 with individual items deleted, for Burn-out was 0.73 ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 with individual items deleted and for Secondary Traumatic Stress was 0.83 ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 with individual items deleted. Additionally, the Pearson correlation r for Compassion Satisfaction, Burn-out and Secondary Traumatic Stress showed strong correlations between test-retest measurements (p

Key words: Professional Quality of Life Scale, Secondary traumatic stress, Compassion fatigue, Compassion Satisfaction, Emotional work.






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.