Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Article



A metagenomic analysis of gut microbiome phylogeny among four economically important carp species from wild and aquaculture farms

Shrihari Ashok Pingle, Abhay John Khandagle.




Abstract

The present study was carried out to compare the gut microbiome of Indian Major Carp and Common carp from wild and aquaculture setting through 16S rDNA sequencing. The library of 16S rDNA V3-V4 hypervariable regions of gut microbiota was amplified, followed by sequencing using Illumina MiSeq. The analysis of sequencing data carried out through the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology pipeline suggests that Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria and Actinobacteria are the most dominant phyla. Some microbial phyla were found to be species-specific. Genera such as Bacillus, Sphingomonas, and Clostridium were highly abundant in cultured forms indicating their role in the survival of cultured forms under considerable ecological stress. The α-diversity and β- diversity indicators suggest that the gut microbiome of cultured forms shows more diversity and also resembles a great extent. Absence of Bacillus spp. in wild form, and low abundance of Lactococcus spp. indicates the need of finding alternatives for probiotics. The insights from the present study can be used for further exploring the role of the gut microbiome in aspects such as growth, immunity and other physiological functions of the fish.

Key words: Aquaculture, Fish gut, Gut Microbiome, Major Carps, Metagenomics






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.