Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research



A study of the differences between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus

Seema, Sangeeta Singh.




Abstract
Cited by 0 Articles

Objective: To compare the outcomes of patients who had vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine enlargement.
Methods: For two years, 50 vaginal hysterectomies were compared to 50 abdominal hysterectomies in a prospective study. Patients' characteristics before, during, and after operations were reviewed and tracked for three months to assess post-operative complications.
Results: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of patient age, parity, uterine size, or intraoperative complications. The vaginal hysterectomy group had a lower operating time, blood loss, post-op demand for analgesia, and hospital stay duration than the abdominal hysterectomy group. TAH was associated with significantly more complications than vaginal hysterectomy.
Conclusion: In the treatment of benign gynaecological disease, vaginal hysterectomy is more effective and safer than abdominal hysterectomy, with greater efficacy and safety even for enlarged and non-prolapsed uteri.

Key words: vaginal hysterectomies, benign gynaecological disease, pelvic adhesions






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.