Home|Journals|Articles by Year|Audio Abstracts
 

Original Research



Comparative Study Of fistulectomy With Sphincteroplasty Vs. Fistulectomy With Sphincteroplasty With Martius Flap Repair For Rectovaginal Fistula

Gaurav Nirwal,Abhishek Gaur,Diksha Agarawal.




Abstract
Cited by 0 Articles

Introduction:
Surgery is the only main treatment for anal fistula. Anal fistulas have been known to humans for over 2000 years, but as a result, surgical treatment remains difficult due to differences in recurrence rates and risk of incontinence.
Aim: To compare the efficacy, effectiveness, post operative outcome in fistulectomy with sphincteroplasty vs. fistulectomy with sphincteroplasty with martius flap repair.
Materials and Method: A total of 24 patients were selected for this study. Out of 24 patients, 13 patients who underwent fistulectomy with sphincteroplasty and 11 patients who underwent fistulectomy with sphincteroplasty with martius flap repair.
Results:
Fistulectomy with sphincteroplasty had success rate of 38.4% (5 patients) where 8 patients showed recurrence. The martius flap repair had success rate of 72.7% (8 patients) where 3 patients showed recurrence and were treated conservatively for 2 weeks and fistulas healed.
Conclusion: The outcomes of this study that martius flap has better post-operative results in terms of recurrence, incontinence; post op wound infection and patient satisfaction

Key words: Anal Fistuals, Sphincteroplasty, Fistulectomy






Full-text options


Share this Article


Online Article Submission
• ejmanager.com




ejPort - eJManager.com
Refer & Earn
JournalList
About BiblioMed
License Information
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us

The articles in Bibliomed are open access articles licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.